╨╧рб▒с>■ <>■ ; ье┴5@ Ё┐bjbj╧2╧2 "$нXнX И╢╢╢╢╢╢╢╩▓▓▓8ъЎ$╩╝>&&&&&ТТТ;======$·RLКa╢ТООТТa╢╢&&hvXXXТ╢&╢&;XТ;X.XЖ▀╢╢& Lф,╙┼▓ТЪў'М0╝ ╓,"╓╩╩╢╢╢╢╓╢ ТТXТТТТТaa╩╩Д Nd N ╩╩NAssessment Sheet (Total Points = 50: 0 = missing, 1 = poor, 2 = adequate, 3 = good, 4 = v. good, 5 = excellent) Abstract: 1 = includes only a few of the necessary components: intro, objectives, results, conclusions 2 = includes some of the necessary components, and is unclear or wordy 3 = most components are present, may be poorly stated 4 = missing one component or some components poorly stated 5 = states all the necessary components clearly and succinctly Introduction: 1 = concept is loosely addressed 2 = concept is defined adequately 3 = concept defined and related to the question posed in this study 4 = in addition, references secondary literature, such as textbooks 5 = references novel sources (e.g. journal articles) and provides correct citations Hypothesis and objectives: 1,2 = provides hypothesis/ research question 3 = clear problem statement/ research question = research question clearly related to background information = shows reasoning for hypothesis selected Methods, 1 = description of site/methods is missing several components Experimental Design: 2 = adequate description of site and methods used 3 = experimental approach is appropriate, but design is lacking in some way (ie. improper method, insufficient sampling design) 4 = design includes all steps necessary, but may be too detailed 5 = design explained well; including all relevant info, but concise Description of Results: 1 = written description of results 2 = in addition, text refers to tables and figures appropriately, i.e., У(Figure 1)Ф 3 = text addresses the most important values or trends 4 = text and visual display of results donТt repeat too much info 5 = good integration of text and tables/figures Display of Results: 1 = table is present, but only shows raw data 2 = table or figure adequately displays results that are discussed 3 = tables or figures are appropriate for the data type 4 = table and figures are easily readable and interpretable 5 = tables and figures are well-labeled: titles and axes, appropriate colors or contrasts Discussion and Interpretation of results: 1 = adequate interpretation of trends 2 = loosely addresses whether data supports hypothesis 3 = good description of whether data supports hypothesis 4 = in addition, some insight as to why results occurred 5 = in addition, includes improvements to study, or other things to examine in the future Conclusions: 1 = provide some conclusion from study, answer hypothesis 2, 3 = conclusions are correct and evident from results 4, 5 = in addition, show how conclusions and concept could be applied elsewhere, or how study is connected to a broader context Format and organization of report: 1 = little organization, several sections out of order 2 = one section out of order, sections are not clearly labeled 3 = several pieces of information put into wrong section 4 = have correct sections, but may have some minor points out of place 5 = sections ordered correctly and are clear and easily understandable Clarity and economy of writing: 1 = very difficult to read and interpret, unedited, contains many typos or logical errors, 2 = pieces seem fragmented, compiled report is unedited, poor sentence structure, several typos 3 = report is more uniform and clear but includes typos, is wordy or includes irrelevant information 4 = report is uniform and clear but includes a few typos or grammatical errors 5 = excellent writing, clear and concise with no typos or grammatical errors ·Ўhr99 hr99CJ rst▌ / e а у х < Б ┼ "lа▀ ∙ўўўўїўырыўы▌ўыы█ыўў╓╓ў &F@&ДpД╨@&^Дp`Д╨ ДpД╨^Дp`Д╨$@&a$ ■■ SЪ ` е ж т 7sэю2y▒эHJKLM\Ю┌їїяэяээуэээээяяяээээрэээ@& ДиДШ■^Ди`ДШ■Д@^Д@ Д@Д└Ї^Д@`Д└ЇRм▓│¤8╕╣║TН╘{Ь╠■f╡їяїээуяэээяїяяээїяїяя┘э╧ ДД╨^Д`Д╨ ДД^Д`Д Д╨Д╨^Д╨`Д╨Д^Д Д@Д╨^Д@`Д╨ ¤¤¤¤¤¤ 1Рh░╨/ ░р=!░а"░#Ра$Ра%░Ь@@ё @NormalCJ_HmH nHsH tHDAЄ бDDefault Paragraph FontVi@є │VTable Normal :VЎ4╓4╓ laЎ(k@Ї ┴(No List4@Є4Header ╞р└!DC@DBody Text Indent Д@^Д@PR@PBody Text Indent 2ДxДШ■^Дx`ДШ■RY"RDocument Map-D M╞ АOJPJQJ\S@2\Body Text Indent 3 ╞@АДиДдЄ@&^Ди`ДдЄ $ rst▌/eаух<Б┼"lа▀ SЪ`ежт7sэю2y▒эHJKLM\Ю┌ R м ▓ │ ¤ 8 ╕ ╣ ║ TН╘{Ь╠■f ╡ 0ААШ0АШ0АШ0АШ0А0ААШ0АtШ0Аt0ААШ0А/Ш0А/Ш0А/0ААШ0АхШ0АхШ0АхШ0АхШ0АхШ0АхШ0АхШ 0АхШ 0АхШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0АА0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААM90фЫrst▌/eаух<Б┼"lа▀ SЪ`ежт7sэю2y▒эHJKLM\Ю┌ R м ▓ │ ¤ 8 ╕ ╣ ║ TН╘{Ь╠■f ╡ 0АААШ0ААШ0АШ0АШ0А0ААШ0АtШ0Аt0ААШ0А/Ш0А/Ш0А/0ААШ0АхШ0АхШ0АхШ0АхШ0АхШ0АхШ0АхШ 0АхШ 0АхАM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM90ЫM908Ы ЁtЁ Ё,2Ё$~▄█иx'$═O)B╦╤▄╦╩ @ё АААўЁТ ЁЁ0Ё( Ё `ЙA ЁЁB ЁSЁ┐╦ ?ЁЁHЁЁ0Ё( Ё Ё>@ptтшbk└╩ эё▀у╓с|А═╒333333333333pа▀ Kimberly Bohn Kimberly Bohn Kimberly Bohn Kimberly Bohn Kimberly Bohn Kimberly Bohn Kimberly Bohn Kimberly Bohn Ruth Yanaiforest eco lab╠вW·у╥Й ДиДШ■╞и^Ди`ДШ■o(╠вW хgar99 @А<вH╨@ Unknown GРЗz А Times New Roman5РАSymbol3&РЗz А Arial;&РУHelveticaK5РА ┐а√№╟hЯMS Gothic- 3 ┤0╖0├0п0"qИЁ╨h─КЪ&─КЪ&а;yїї$Ёаа┤┤ББ24d-3ГqЁ▀▀H(Ё ?ф ga Assessment SheetPreferred Customerforest eco lab■ рЕЯЄ∙OhлС+'│┘0ЬШа╝╚фЁ№ $0 LXd p|ДМФфAssessment SheetdssePreferred CustomerrefrefNORMALeforest eco labm2reMicrosoft Word 10.0@╥Ik@?Snu├@p,╙┼@p,╙┼ї■ ╒═╒Ь.УЧ+,∙о0hpФЬдм┤╝─╠ ╘ёфDell Computer CorporationAsн Assessment SheetTitle ■ ■ !"#$%&'()*■ ,-./012■ 456789:■ ¤ =■ ■ ■ Root Entry └F┬э,╙┼?АData 1Table цWordDocument "$SummaryInformation( +DocumentSummaryInformation8 3CompObj j ■ ■ └FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8Ї9▓q